1995-05-08                     Senate Journal                      Page 1650
HB 35                                                                        
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 35(JUD) "An Act relating to sexual                       
misconduct as grounds for imposing disciplinary sanctions on persons           
licensed by the State Medical Board" was read the second time.                 
                                                                               
Senator Green moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption               
of the Health, Education and Social Services Senate Committee                  
Substitute offered on page 1561.  Senator Duncan objected, then                
withdrew his objection.                                                        
                                                                               

1995-05-08                     Senate Journal                      Page 1651
HB 35                                                                        
There being no further objections, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR                        
HOUSE BILL NO. 35(HES) "An Act relating to sexual misconduct                   
as grounds for imposing disciplinary sanctions on persons licensed             
by the State Medical Board" was adopted and read the second time.              
                                                                               
Senator Salo offered Amendment No. 1 :                                          
                                                                               
Page 2, lines 27 - 28:                                                         
	Delete all text following "patient"; and insert:                              
	"was the licensee's spouse at the time of the contact or,                     
immediately preceding the physician-patient relationship, was in a             
dating, courtship or engagement relationship with the licensee;"               
                                                                               
Senator Salo moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1.  Senator               
Leman objected.                                                                
                                                                               
The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?"  The roll              
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
SCS CSHB 35(HES)                                                               
Second Reading                                                                 
Amendment No. 1                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  17   NAYS:  2   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Green, Halford, Hoffman,                   
Kelly, Lincoln, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor,               
Torgerson, Zharoff                                                             
                                                                               
Nays:  Leman, Miller                                                           
                                                                               
Excused:  Donley                                                               
                                                                               
and so, Amendment No. 1 was adopted.                                           
                                                                               
Senator Halford moved and asked unanimous consent that the bill be             
considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final            
passage.  Senator Duncan objected.                                             
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall the bill be advanced to third reading?"            
The roll was taken with the following result:                                  
                                                                               

1995-05-08                     Senate Journal                      Page 1652
HB 35                                                                        
                                                                               
SCS CSHB 35(HES) am S                                                          
Advance from Second to Third Reading?                                          
                                                                               
YEAS:  12   NAYS:  7   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce,                    
R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson                                   
                                                                               
Nays:  Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff                   
                                                                               
Excused:  Donley                                                               
                                                                               
and so, the bill was not advanced to third reading.                            
                                                                               
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 35(HES) am S will                          
appear on the May 9 calendar.